Original prompt
"Write a blog post about marketing"
"This prompt has less direction than a blindfolded GPS. You gave the AI nothing � no audience, no angle, no length, no tone. You might as well have asked it to 'do stuff.'"
Paste any AI prompt. Get it brutally roasted, scored out of 100, and instantly improved � using the CRISP framework. Works for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, GPT-5, and every major AI.
Roast Intensity
Three steps to a dramatically better AI prompt
Paste any prompt you've written for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, GPT-5, Copilot, or any other AI. Doesn't matter how bad it is — that's the point.
Pick from Light, Medium, Savage, or Nuclear. AI analyzes your prompt using the CRISP framework and delivers scored, funny, educational feedback.
Get a CRISP-optimized version of your prompt. Copy it, share it, or open it directly in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or Copilot — one click.
The same bad prompt, four very different roasts
""Write a blog post about marketing" — not quite right, but your heart is in the right place. The AI will manage, bravely, with what you've given it."
""Write a blog post about marketing" — you've handed a compass to someone and said "go." To where? Doesn't matter. The AI is taking a creative gap year on your dime."
"You didn't write a prompt. You wrote a hope and a prayer. "Write a blog post about marketing" — about ALL marketing? Cool. I'll get back to you in 40,000 words covering everything from 1900s newspaper ads to TikTok influencers."
"This prompt is the AI equivalent of calling 911 and saying "something's happening." "Write a blog post about marketing" — which marketing? For whom? In what year? On what planet? Congratulations, you've achieved maximum vagueness."
Prompts that deserved exactly what they got
The 5-element scoring system behind every roast � and the fix
Prompt roasting is the practice of analyzing an AI prompt for structural weaknesses � missing context, no role assignment, vague instructions, absent format constraints � and delivering that feedback in a funny, memorable way. The humor makes the lesson stick. Instead of reading a dry guide on prompt engineering, you get roasted and immediately understand exactly what you did wrong.
Most prompts fail for one of five reasons: no context (the AI doesn't know the background), no role assignment (you haven't told the AI what expert to be), vague instructions (what exactly should it do?), missing format and length specifics, or no stated purpose (what will you use this output for?). Models like GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.7, and Gemini 2.5 Pro are remarkably capable � but they pattern-match to your input. Garbage in, garbage out.
GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Grok 4 all respond dramatically better to structured prompts. Role-primed prompts produce more expert-level vocabulary. Context-rich prompts reduce irrelevant output by 60�80%. Format-specified prompts produce outputs you can actually use without significant editing. The CRISP framework captures all five dimensions that matter � and is why Roast My Prompt uses it as its scoring system.
Most prompts score under 30/100. Find out how yours does � and walk away with a better version. Free. Takes 10 seconds.
Also see: Prompt Engineering Guide � ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini � Prompt Templates